Thomas MOLINEAUX Jonathan MULLINIX John MULLINAX Rebecca HASLIP Elizabeth AMY Mini tree diagram

Jonathan MULLINAX3

also known as Jonathan MULLINIX4

17051 - 17903,2

Tobacco planter

Life History

before 1705

Born in England, UK.1

(less likely)

1705

Born in England, UK.3,2

(most likely)

10th Jun 1726

Immigrated to sailed from Middlesex, England, to Maryland as an indentured servant (or a convict).1

1730

Married Rebecca HASLIP in Anne Arundel County, Maryland.2

between 1731 and 1733

Birth of son Jonathan MULLINIX in Anne Arundel County, Maryland.4,5,4

1737

Birth of son John MULLINAX in Camden, York, South Carolina.6,7

1790

Death of Rebecca HASLIP in Anne Arundel County, Maryland.3,8,2

1790

Died in Anne Arundel County, Maryland.3,2

Notes

  • The name is also spelled Jonothan, and the surname appears in many sources as Mullineaux.  His father's name is sometimes spelled Mulleneaux.

    Names are similar generation to generation, so interpreting the sources is a bit uncertain.  But some genealogies, such as the one I used from George Moss, have another generation in her, with another Jonathan Mullineaux as son of Thomas and father of this Jonathan.  Dates are missing or uncertain in many sources, so there are some problems with ages and birth dates.

    Those sources giving a date of birth for Thomas, report the date as 1674.  The common date of birth for the first Jonathan (Jonothan/Jonathon) Mullineaux is about 1685, and for the second Jonathan Mullinax 1705.  This puts a bit of a squeeze on the age for fathering.  This makes Thomas a very young father with only 11 years between his birth and that of the first Jonathan!  So I was uncertain how to report the birth dates for Thomas.

    There are not enough details available yet to fully resolve this problem.  Because of this uncertainty, I have removed the first Jonathan Mullinax from this sequence.  Another possibility is that this Thomas Mulleneaux is incorrectly considered the father of Jonathan (born 1705).  The genealogy showing dates for Thomas, also indicate that this Thomas Mulleneaux died in Delaware in 1728.  While this is possible, it brings up a question since some sources (followed by many genealogies) say his son and some others named Mullineaux arrived in the colonies in Maryland, as indentured servants (the sources below says "convicts") in 1726.

    This story about the arrival of Jonathan in the colonies as an indentured servant seems to be wrong or refers to a different Jonathan.  I am investigating further sources.  For information, I am including below the information from George Moss that is questioned by some researchers.

    There seems to be an error in some genealogies (usually undocumented) in the positioning of a Jonathan Mullinax, wife of Susanna Greenberry and father of Greenberry Mullinix/Mullinax.  There are several genealogies that confuse two lines of Mullinaxes with some making Greenberry the son of John, son of Jonathan, and others make his the son of Jonathan.

    I have reconstructed the line of that Jonathan and his son Greenberry, which I am reasonably satisfied with.  I worked with clues from a Mullinix descendant in the Midwest who was researching the Indiana-Illinois-Missouri Mullinix line from Greenberry.

    The name of Jonathan (born 1705) also appears with variation, as seen in the following documentation from another genealogist.  But his name is more commonly seen with the more completely Anglicized American spelling of Mullinax or Mullinix.

    -----------------------------------------
    Notes Imported [reorganized for chronological order] to the Jenkins GED from
    http://awtc.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=georgemoss46&id=I1775

    Arrived from Middlesex, England on the ship "Loyal Margaret" as a convict in 1726. JONOTHAN3 MULLINIX, JR (JONOTHAN MULLINEAUX2 SR., THOMAS1 MOLINEAUX) was born 1705 in England, and died 1790 in Anne Arundel County, Maryland.  He married REBECCA HASLIP 1730 in Anne Arundel County, MD, daughter of JOSEPH HASLIP and AGNES (?).  She was born January 29, 1708/09 in St. James Parish, Anne Arundel County, MD, and died in Anne Arundel County, MD.

    Notes for JONOTHAN MULLINIX, JR:
    Immigrant: Jonathan Mullineaux sailed from Newgate for Maryland on June 10, 1726 on the Loyal Margrett, Captain John Wheaton.  There were 69 passengers listed per PRO T53/32 Pps. 386/387.

    Newsclip: Robert Barnes. 'Marr's and deaths from the Md. Gazette 1727-1839'
    "Joseph Cranwell, servant of Jonathan Mullinix of Elkridge, ran away from his master.  (27 Nov. 1751).   A body was found Mon. last back of Elkridge, supposed to be that of Joseph Cranwell.  (12 Mar 1752)"

    Keren Mauer Gree, 'Abstracts from Md. Gazette, 1727-1761'  Galveston, The Frontier Press. 1990.  Lofc.   No. 89-082073. ISBN #:  0-932231-07-1
    p 95. Wed. 27 Nov 1751 No. 344, Jonathan Mullineaux living at Elk Ridge reports a runaway servant, Joseph Cranwell, and a stray horse.
    p 156. Thu. 8 May 1755 No. 522. Jonathan Mullineaux at Elk Ridge reports a stray horse.
    p161. Thu 14 Aug 1755 No. 536. Jonathan Mullenux, living on Mr. Carroll's manor, reports a runaway servant, John Broof, imported on the Rose by Capt. Slade. Deliver to H. Bateman at Elk Ridge landing.
    p 162, Thu. 21 Aug 1755 No. 537.  John Raitt, Sheriff, has in custody a John Bruff who belongs to Jonathan Mulleneux of Elk Ridge.
    p 177. Thu. 10 Jun 1756 No. 579.  Jonathan Mulleneux has been confined in Ann Arbor County jail for a long time for debt, and will petition the Assembly for relief.

    The surname Haslip may be found as Hazelop/Hazelope

    Oaths of fidelity, Ann Arbor County, Maryland February 1777
    Jonathan Mulleneaux, Sr
    Henry Mulleneaux
    Thomas Mulleneaux
    William Mulleneaux

    Tax list 1785
    Jonathan Mulleniks
    Aaron Hill, Randolph County, NC
    --------------------------------

    An alternative marriage date is recorded by one source:
    Rebecca MULLINIX MULLINAX
    nee Rebecca HAZELOPE HASLIP 37147
    ca 1741 Anne Arundel Co, MD
    Jonothan MULLINIX MULLINAX

    This surely is too late, since they would be about 40 years old at this time.

Sources

Page created using GEDmill 1.11.0